In the history of virology there's never been a truly isolated virus, and repeated attempts at proving 'contagion' have all failed. Viruses are man-made fairy tales and do not exist - not as we are taught about them, anyway.
The teaching of 'Germ Theory' (fear the 'germs' - the 'invaders') was not always majority opinion or school of thought, but because a lot of money, propaganda, and blatant falsification of data it has become the mainstream thinking - even with a complete absence of evidence to support their claims.
Immediately, you might think I have lost my mind - "Of course viruses exist! I just had the flu!" - but please read on a bit with an open mind as there is a great deal of evidence that demonstrates Germ Theory is one gigantic lie, and you might get a different perspective on what might have actually caused you to become ill!
While initially this extreme change in thinking might be hard for some to wrap their heads around, understanding is critically important. Germ Theory only benefits
Big Pharma while doing great harm to massive numbers of people and creating a tremendous amount of suffering.
When I came across this info and started to research it, I had already been a Registered Nurse for 15+ years - and initially I found it hard to believe, as anyone newly reading this from me will likely also find it hard to believe at first glance. A lie so huge?? On such a massive scale?? Sadly, yes.
In fact, Germ Theory demonstrates many logical flaws when held up to scientific principles. Actually, it completely falls apart when scrutinized! When we recognize and understand the true root cause of our 'diseases' and learn what actually promotes and sustains our well-being - e.g. Terrain model - it's a complete game-changer in how we view health!
- - - - - - - -
Germ Theory is a well-funded lie to make a great deal of profit off the 'germ' and the fear becoming 'infected' can invoke. (Fear campaigns leading to massive profit - sound familiar?)
https://wickedtruths.org/en/viruses-do-not-exist
As said, there has never been a truly isolated virus and repeated attempts at proving 'contagion' have failed. What is generally meant by isolation is to take a sample from an 'infected' patient and directly view and isolate the so-called 'virus' under such technology as an electron microscope. Bacteria are scientifically provable, and this can be done. This cannot be done with so-called 'viruses'.
With specific regard to the recent claim of a 'Covid pandemic' this lack of viral isolation is openly admitted in the FDA's own documents. 'If
you read page 43 of their own document (FDA website) you will see that
they openly admit to having taken a simulation out of stock and there
was no *Covid* samples available for comparison.
page 43 (page 43 in most browsers - found under 'Performance Characteristics')
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
This page states: “Since
no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC
use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays
designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with
characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA...”
That is merely fancy language for multiplication of computer-simulated strands that prove no existence of anything. All known 'viruses' are computer-simulated gibberish. Some of the following videos expain this process and how the field of virology is based entirely on complete fraud and pseudoscence.
- - - - - - - - -
We then use inappropriate ‘testing’ methods such as PCR and claim it demonstrates the presence of said ‘virus’, conveniently ignoring that a PCR set on a high cycle could - and would - show everyone has 'Ebola' and many other so-called ‘viruses’ too.
Kary Mullis - an American biochemist and chemistry Nobel laureate - invented PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction). Kary described PCR testing as “a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That’s what it is. It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that.”
They take a sample, they add certain culture mediums and unnatural substances including antibiotics, then they amplify whatever debris is left. They make random guesses to fill in any gaps in the sequence fragments - resulting in a completely made-up fantasy. Then they call this strand of utter nonsense a 'virus' and patent it. (the Stefan Lanka video above better explains this process)
But, the problem is - the necessary control experiments have never been done. That is, until now...watch the video below to see Stefan Lanka perform the control experiments and see what happens:
Patent laws also reveal the deception of any naturally-occurring 'virus'. ‘Viruses’ as we know them are able to be patented. However, no ‘product of nature’ patents are allowed. You cannot - by law - patent a naturally occurring bacteria as they are a ‘product of nature’. So why can they patent a ‘virus’? The answer is they are man-made and not ‘naturally occurring’ at all.
https://patents.stackexchange.com/questions/13381/can-you-patent-an-existing-bacteria-without-any-modifications
- - - - - - - -
Pellagra, Typhoid, cholera, yellow fever, and other alleged ‘infectious diseases’ disappeared when people were provided nutrition, clean water, and sanitation. Polio was/is associated with DDT/other toxins and poisons. Toxins and poisons and deficiencies are overwhelmingly the cause of ''illness' and 'disease', which aligns with Terrain Theory.
Most people’s ‘opinion’ is that viruses are identifiable vectors for us to potentially catch a contagious illness. But that is simply not true. The reality is - in any true measurable data performed under actual scientific principles of Koch’s postulates – no one has never successfully isolated a ‘virus’.
Many medical people have an extremely difficult time even considering the error of Germ Theory because they think they have seen these 'contagious' phenomenon for their own eyes...but in fact they should just look a little closer for the underlying etiology.
As said, there has NEVER - stress NEVER been a 'virus' that has been isolated under their own 'Gold Standard' which is Koch's Postulates. The following article describes the Postulates but is more specific to Coronavirus/Covid. Bear in mind this applies to them ALL. Never isolated and no proven contagion.
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/
We must be willing to consider that everything we think to be true might not be true at all if we want to create a truly healthy and educated society.
The inability to demonstrate contagion:
In March of 1919 Rosenau & Keegan conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687
In November 1919, 8 separate experiments were conducted by Rosenau et al. in a group of 62 men trying to prove that influenza is contagious and causes disease. In all 8 experiments, 0/62 men became sick. Another set of 8 experiments were undertaken in December of 1919 by McCoy et al. in 50 men to try and prove contagion. Once again, all 8 experiments failed to prove people with influenza, or their bodily fluids cause illness. 0/50 men became sick. In 1919, Wahl et al. conducted 3 separate experiments to infect 6 healthy men with influenza by exposing them to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people. 0/6 men contracted influenza in any of the three studies.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082102?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
In 1920, Schmidt et al conducted two controlled experiments, exposing healthy people to the bodily fluids of sick people. Of 196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 (10.7%) developed colds and three developed grippe (1.5%). In the second group, of the 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, five developed grippe (5.9%) and four colds (4.7%). Of forty-three controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions eight (18.6%) developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the “virus”.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/102609951
In 1921, Williams et al. tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
In 1924, Robertson & Groves exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. The authors concluded that 0/100 became sick as a result of being exposed to the bodily secretions.
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-abstract/34/4/400/832936?redirectedFrom=fulltextA
In 1930, Dochez et al. attempted to infect a group of men experimentally with the common cold. The authors stated in their results, something that is nothing short of amazing. “It was apparent very early that this individual was more or less unreliable and from the start it was possible to keep him in the dark regarding our procedure. He had inconspicuous symptoms after his test injection of sterile broth and no more striking results from the cold filtrate, until an assistant, on the second day after injection, inadvertently referred to this failure to contract a cold. That evening and night the subject reported severe symptomatology, including sneezing, cough, sore throat and stuffiness in the nose. The next morning he was told that he had been misinformed in regard to the nature of the filtrate and his symptoms subsided within the hour. It is important to note that there was an entire absence of objective pathological changes”.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869798/
In 1937 Burnet & Lush conducted an experiment exposing 200 healthy people to bodily secretions from people infected with influenza. 0/200 became sick.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2065253/
In 1940, Burnet and Foley tried to experimentally infect 15 university students with influenza. The authors concluded their experiment was a failure.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1940.tb79929.x
https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2021/02/22/contagion-a-fairy-story/
So a common question – “If there is no such thing as a infectious virus, then why did diseases decline and/or vaccines eradicate these diseases?”
There is plenty of evidence available to answer this question. Vaccines never eradicated anything. An unbiased review of the evidence demonstrates vaccines have never been demonstrated to work at all – unless harming people and making a lot of money for pharmaceutical companies is the definition of 'working'..
Disease declined because of improvement in the human TERRAIN.
The 19th-century population shift from country to city that accompanied industrialization and immigration led to overcrowding in newly populated cities that lacked proper sanitation or clean water systems. These conditions resulted in repeated outbreaks of cholera, dysentery, TB, typhoid fever, influenza, yellow fever, and malaria. By 1900, however, the incidence of many of these diseases had begun to decline because of public health improvements, implementation of which continued into the 20th century.
Sanitation & Hygiene
Local, state, and federal efforts to improve sanitation and hygiene reinforced the concept of collective ‘public health’ action (e.g. to prevent infection by providing clean drinking water). By 1900, 40 of the 45 states had established health departments. The first county health departments were established in 1908.
From the 1930s through the 1950s, state and local health departments made substantial progress in disease prevention activities, including sewage disposal, water treatment, food safety, organized solid waste disposal, and public education about hygienic practices (e.g. food handling and handwashing).
https://learntherisk.org/vaccines/diseases/
"Scientific medicine has taken credit it does not deserve for some advances in health...In fact, cholera, typhoid, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough, etc., were in decline before vaccines for them became available - the result of better methods of sanitation, sewage disposal, and distribution of food and water." Dr Andrew Weil, Health and Healing
Florence Nightingale truly understood the true origin of illness and her very basic insights and interventions provided astounding improvements in human health. However, if Florence Nightingale existed today, she would be discredited as best they could (as they do with anyone who dissents), and likely removed from any position of ever helping people...silenced…to maintain the total control they have garnered over the population based on blatant deception (Germ Theory) that easily falls apart when actually examined.
Contagion and infectious 'germs' have never been demonstrated despite many years of trying. We are being repeatedly poisoned and nutritionally boycotted - and sometimes unknowingly poisoning ourselves - and it is all based on a long history of utter deception and fabrication.
https://t.me/OpposedtoVaccines
Related articles:
Contagion called into question
Contagion and epidemics: bacteria
Kary Mullis and some info about PCR
Debunking the 'virus':
Polio
HIV/AIDS
Flu Season
Measles
Spanish Flu
No comments:
Post a Comment