Friday, January 19, 2024

The Truth About Soy


Soy Myths and Misinformation
By Holly Wilson MD

Soy has long been recognized as a nutrient-dense food and as an excellent source of protein by respected dietitians and clinical nutritionists. (1) The soybean contains all of the essential amino acids, as well as an impressive list of micronutrients (vitamins and minerals). Micronutrients in rich supply in soy include: calcium, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, vitamins B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B9, C and zinc. Fiber and omega-3 and 6 fatty acids are also present in soy. The composition of these nutrients varies among preparations, but is in the highest quantity in whole soy foods such as edamame (whole soy beans), soy milk, tofu and tempeh.

Yet despite the powerful health benefits of whole soy foods, myths and misinformation regarding the ‘dangers’ of soy consumption are being widely circulated and presented as fact. I will address a few of these myths by taking a closer look at some of the sources of confusion and controversy.

“All soy is GMO!”
I would like to begin by explaining that the largest consumer of commercially grown GMO soybeans, both in the US and globally, is farmed animals. GMOs are genetically modified organisms, and their safety for human consumption is a hot topic of debate; many European countries have banned GMOs. While long term studies and conclusive data on the health effects of GMOs are lacking, GMOs are ubiquitous in our food supply. Soybeans are one of several major food staples now dominated by genetic modification. Currently, 81% of the global soybean crop is genetically modified, and approximately 85% of all GMO soybeans end up in farmed animal feed. The GMO soy consumed by farmed animals is utilized as a source of protein by them, and does not just magically evaporate in the slaughterhouse or the milk processing plant. It ends up on your plate.

But while an alarming percentage of soybeans are genetically modified, the claim that “all soy is GMO” is one of the great soy myths. Of the soy directly consumed by humans, non-GMO soy foods such as tofu, tempeh and soy milk are widely available in stores which offer soy products, and they are clearly labeled non-GMO.

“But I heard soy causes cancer!”
Misinformation regarding soy’s relationship to cancer largely stems from confusion around the presence of phytoestrogens in soy. Phytoestrogen is not estrogen. Estrogen and testosterone are steroid hormones, and occur naturally in both sexes of humans, as well as in animals used for food. They help regulate sexual function and secondary sexual characteristics, in addition to nonsexual cellular functions. While estrogen plays many important beneficial roles in humans, it also naturally promotes proliferation of cells, and, at high levels, can increase risk of some cancers by encouraging cells to multiply more than they usually would. Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women (specifically, taking only estrogen) has also been implicated in cancer growth. (2)

While soy does not contain estrogen, animal foods do. Many consumers are aware that animals used for meat and dairy are commonly supplemented with synthetic growth hormones, but what they don’t consider is that animal flesh and cow milk also contain their own naturally occurring estrogen— and this is true even of “grass-fed” and “organic” animals. Furthermore, meat, dairy and eggs all contain phytoestrogens; they are pervasive in our food, both plant and animal-derived, and you are not avoiding them entirely by avoiding soy.

Phytoestrogen is just a catchall term for numerous naturally occurring plant compounds which are structurally similar to mammalian estrogen, and functionally are weakly estrogenic (weakly mimicking estrogen) or antiestrogenic (blocking estrogen’s effects). The metabolism and functionality of phytoestrogens are incredibly complex, and vary between individuals. The concern over soy and cancer stems from the fact that soy-based foods contain phytoestrogens (specifically, isoflavones) in varying amounts (depending on the preparation), and these react with the estrogen receptor. There are two types of estrogen receptors in humans: alpha and beta. Alpha are distributed widely throughout the body, whereas beta are localized in the ovary, prostate, lung, and epididymis (testicle). While isoflavones, like estrogen, bind to both alpha and beta receptors (preferentially to beta), isoflavones do not have the estrogenic effect of inducing tumor growth. In fact, isoflavones have demonstrated a protective benefit against hormone-dependent cancers.

The inverse relationship between soy consumption and risk of developing premenopausal breast cancer has been clearly established. In other words, higher rates of soy intake are associated with lower rates of breast cancer. (3) However, large clinical trials have not yet been conducted regarding the effect of phytoestrogen consumption on tumor growth in established cancer patients. (4) To date, such studies have utilized small sample sizes, and the methods for obtaining data were highly variable. There have been ‘promising’ results from multiple animal models, demonstrating a reduction in tumor size with consumption of soy protein. Yet, aside from the immorality of artificially inducing cancer in unwilling participants, it is dangerous to compare laboratory animals to humans. We are not mice. Even within our species, there is tremendous variability in the metabolic processing of phytoestrogens and pharmacological agents, thus establishing the difficulty and complexity of this area of research. Instead, attention should be placed on the already available mass of epidemiological data which compares Asian cultures to those consuming a Western diet.

Soy has been a major staple in Asian cultures for centuries, and their incidence of coronary artery disease, hypertension, ischemic stroke, hormone-dependent cancers, osteoporosis, postmenopausal hip fracture, diabetes, and obesity are all markedly lower than what is seen here in the US. However, when sectors of these populations begin to consume foods based more on the Western diet, not surprisingly, their patterns of disease begin to mimic ours as well. I recall this point being made in medical school. The terms ‘vegan’ and ‘plant-based’ were not yet widely in use, yet there was at least recognition of the association between geographic variability in diet, and health conditions. During this time, the human genome project was completed. I had made the connection that independent of the mass of genetic information all humans share, how we live and what we eat will have a huge and direct impact on our health.

To cite just one example, the Okinawa Centenarian Study analyzed the health and dietary patterns of over 900 centenarians (individuals of 100 years of age or older) living on the Japanese island of Okinawa. Individuals in their 70s, 80s and 90s were evaluated as well. The Japanese Ministry of Health has been maintaining a family register for the entire country since the 1870s, and it is updated every 5 years. The world’s highest known concentration of centenarians live in Okinawa. Regular physical activity, lean BMIs (body mass index), and high consumption of fruits, vegetables and soy are all a part of traditional Okinawan lifestyle. Their aging population enjoy healthier lives and much lower rates of cancer (breast, ovarian, prostate and colon) as compared to those in the U.S., and even to those on the Japanese mainland. Their rates of dementia, osteoporosis, and coronary artery disease are also impressively low. By comparison, based on my 10 years of clinical experience, I can attest to the fact that our aging population suffers a high incidence of debilitating disease, dependency on pharmaceuticals, depression, and difficulty with mobility and physical activity.

The myth of ‘moobs’ (man boobs)
“Moobs” is another of the heavily circulated soy myths with no actual basis in scientific fact. I am reminded of the fear I had of swallowing bubblegum as a child — “because it will take 7 years to digest!” Gynecomastia is the medical term for developed breasts in men. Fetal sexual organ formation and secondary sexual characteristic development are essentially hormone driven. The ‘soy causes man boobs’ urban legend is thus likely rooted in the confusion between estrogen and phytoestrogen, but, as previously explained, phytoestrogen is not estrogen. If indeed this were the case, there would be a lot of men in need of bras.

In reality, clinical studies in men show that isoflavones do not affect testosterone levels or circulating estrogen levels. Even at levels of isoflavone exposure significantly higher than those of a typical Asian male consuming a soy rich diet, isoflavones have not been found to have feminizing effects. (6)

Soy myths and hysteria from the Weston A. Price Foundation
Soy myths and hysteria and the Weston A. Price Foundation (WAPF) are inseparable. Much of the fear-mongering around soy is a direct result of misinformation disseminated by the WAPF’s relentless anti-soy campaigns. The WAPF, registered as a nonprofit organization, is a multimillion dollar operation that lobbies for raw milk and grass-fed beef. Its members (often farmers) make financial contributions and in turn benefit from WAPF promotion. One of the WAPF’s ongoing strategies for promoting animal farming interests is a concerted effort to discredit veganism in general, and soy in particular. Soyfoods sales have climbed from $500 million in 1992 to $5.2 billion in 2011. The soy industry is expanding exponentially, thus posing a potential threat to the products the WAPF are trying to peddle. In response, the Weston Price Foundation actively publishes articles which propagate the supposed dangers of soy consumption, citing clinical and medical journals in an attempt to appear credible.

To give one example, there is a recent blog entry on the WAPF website from board member Kaayla Daniel, who attempted to interpret an article from the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) in a way that would promote the WAPF’s anti-soy agenda. On July 10 2013, JAMA published ‘Effect of Soy Protein Isolate Supplementation on Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy’. (5) The study was well conducted (randomized and double-blind), and aimed to analyze whether or not soy intake would have any effect on patients being treated for advanced prostate cancer. Oncologists measured PSA (prostate specific antigen) in the blood at specific time intervals to assess response. It is not surprising that in patients with a lifetime consumption of foods high in animal fat and protein, pesticides, preservatives and antibiotics, and after a diagnosis of advanced cancer — that the biochemical markers were not affected by soy ingestion. The study could yield no solid conclusions about soy, except that with advanced prostate cancer, the consumption of soy will not reduce biochemical markers. Yet, the WAPF skewed data and selectively interpreted the study to support claims that further their anti-soy agenda.

It’s also worth noting: Dr. Weston A Price (1870-1948) was a dentist, not a physician or a dietician. He studied teeth from primitive cultures and formulated dietary recommendations for modern society based on dental decay observations.

Soy and thyroid function
The thyroid gland has the essential function of controlling metabolism. There are multiple dietary nutrients required for the production of thyroid hormone, iodine being the most widely recognized. The relationship between soy consumption, iodine deficiency and goiter (enlarged thyroid) was first described in 1960 in The New England Journal of Medicine. Infants consuming nonfortified soy-based formula developed goiter, yet the exact nature of the relationship was unclear. Since then, there have been numerous studies which have disproven the causal relationship between soy and thyroid toxicity. (7)

TPO (thyroid peroxidase) is an enzyme located in the thyroid gland that catalyzes the necessary reactions to formulate thyroid hormone. Studies involving rats, pigs and humans demonstrated decreased TPO activity when fed isolated genistein and daidzein (the isoflavones in soy that react most strongly with TPO). Although some TPO activity was lost, there was no overall negative effect on thyroid function. Thyroid hormone levels measured in the blood of both experimental and control groups were the same. Furthermore, humans (as well as rats) only demonstrated hypothyroidism if their soy diets were iodine-depleted. 

What types of soy foods are healthiest?
In discussions of soy foods, the assertion is sometimes made that only fermented soy foods are safe and healthful to consume, with the eating habits of traditional Asian cultures cited as support for this claim. In fact, contrary to this common misconception, the soy products regularly consumed in Asian countries are not all, or even primarily, fermented. According to research from Ginny Messina, R.D., “In Japan, about half of soy consumption comes from the fermented foods miso and natto, and half comes from tofu and dried soybeans. In Shanghai, most of the soy foods consumed are unfermented, with tofu and soymilk making the biggest contributions. In fact, even in Indonesia, where tempeh is a revered national food, unfermented soy products like tofu account for around half of soy intake.”

Personally, I enjoy a wide variety of healthful foods. I frequent my local farmers market, and buy locally grown, organic produce that is in season. When it comes to soy foods, I am always careful to buy non-GMO products, which are easy to find and are clearly labeled. Thai-style stir fry and tofu scramble are among my favorite tofu dishes; they are easy to prepare and can be made in one pan. I also season and bake firm tofu, then place it in a wrap for a quick lunch. In the winter months, I make creamy vegetable soups with a soy milk base, and grilled tempeh is great on sandwiches and crumbled over salads. There are numerous websites and cookbooks which offer delicious soy recipes, ranging from super-easy to gourmet.

Whole soy foods are safe and nutritious. I recommend incorporating them into a diet which contains a good variety of fresh fruits and vegetables, grains and legumes.

_____________________________

(1) Tucker, Katherine L. et al. “Simulation with Soy Replacement Showed That Increased Soy Intake Could Contribute to Improved Nutrient Intake Profiles in the U.S. Population.” The Journal of Nutrition, doi: 10.3945/jn.110.123901; 27 October 2010

(2) Morito, Keiko. et al. “Interaction of Phytoestrogens with Estrogen Receptors Alpha and Beta.” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Vol. 24, Issue 4, pp. 351-356, April 2001

(3) Lee, Sang-Ah. et al. “Adolescent and Adult Soy Intake and Breast Cancer Risk: Results from the Shanghai Women’s Health Study.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 89, Issue 6, pp. 1920-1926, June 2009

(4) Wu, A H. et al. “Epidemiology of Soy Exposures and Breast Cancer Risk.” British Journal of Cancer, Vol 98, Issue 1, pp. 9-14, 15 January 2008

(5) Bosland, Maarten C. et al. “Effect of Soy Protein Isolate Supplementation on Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Trial.” The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 310, Issue 2, pp. 170-178, 10 July, 2013

(6) Messina, Mark. “Soybean isoflavone exposure does not have feminizing effects on men: a critical examination of the clinical evidence.” Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 93, Issue 7 , pp. 2095-2104, 1 May 2010

(7) Chang, Hebron C. et al. “Dietary Genistein Inactivates Rat Thyroid Peroxidase in Vivo without an Apparent Hypothyroid Effect.” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Vol 198, Issue 3, pp. 244-252, 1 November 2000

https://www.pcrm.org/good-nutrition/nutrition-information/soy-and-health

https://nutritionstudies.org/study-finds-dairy-not-soy-skyrockets-breast-cancer-risk/

https://youtu.be/JGYrS1lfNwY?si=HvEAMSTaF4fvjYD7

https://freefromharm.org/health-nutrition/vegan-doctor-addresses-soy-myths-and-misinformation/




Thursday, January 11, 2024

Do veg children have "stunted growth"???

  

How the meat, dairy and Big Pharma industry skews study results to scare people into staying unhealthy:

Several times people have posted to me that a veg diet for children will “stunt childrens' growth.” I have been aware of these completely misrepresented studies for some time but hadn’t gotten around to writing about it, so I am going to briefly address the utter falsehood of these claims. Sadly, the industries intent on keeping kids unhealthy and diseased always present study results in a light that scares the hell out of anyone not willing or capable of doing the research to counteract their lies and manipulation.

This claim stems from a few limited studies that seemed to show vegetarian or vegan children were shorter than their peers, leading to claims of “stunted growth”. The sickness industries will quickly hold this detail up in an ongoing attempt to keep our kids unhealthy – “What terrible parent would limit their children’s growth?!?!?” What they NEVER mention is that in ALL studies conducted these same children caught up with their peers around preschool age and this deviation DID NOT CONTINUE past 5 years old (e.g. there was actually NO difference in long-term height development).

There are several theories on why this might be. From many years of reading about learning nutrition and our food system, I believe children consuming anything that contains hormones and probably drugs (as we know, animal ‘proteins’ contain hormones and are often saturated with drugs including antibiotics) caused ABNORMAL growth spurts in very young children and the veg children actually appear to have developed MORE NORMALLY and consistently than their non-veg peers.

One detail that SHOULD be considered as important was the veg children had both healthier cholesterol levels and body fat – in essence veg children had a DECREASED risk of obesity and developing cardiovascular disease – our number one killers on a massive scale!

So, a word to the wise (and the unwise) – be VERY careful how you read and interpret studies, as there are almost always angles that can be exploited by the interests of the sickness industry into the perpetuation of making you and your child sick. Also pay close attention to who funded the study and what their desired results were, as that is how they will write the study to skew the perception of the findings, knowing most people will absorb only the headlines and will not read further into the matter to find the real truth.

https://vegankidsnutrition.com/blog/vegan-diets-and-stunted-growth-in-children

https://plantbasednews.org/lifestyle/health/vegan-children-stunted-growth-bones/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19562864/

https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/149/6/e2021052598/186964/Vegetarian-Diet-Growth-and-Nutrition-in-Early

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2771551/




Monday, August 28, 2023

Breastfeeding toxins?

 

Why don’t we tell nursing mothers to avoid milk/dairy?

We know that cow’s milk/dairy proteins can pass through the mother’s breast milk, and we have a great deal of evidence that giving cow’s milk or dairy to infants can be harmful…so why don’t they tell breastfeeding mothers to avoid cow’s milk and dairy? (In reality, combined with all the other health risks, one should never consume these animal-based health disasters, but right now wondering why we don’t at least try to protect the babies.)

Type 1 diabetes is linked to consumption of dairy products in infancy. For example, the American Academy of Pediatrics observed up to a 30% reduction in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in infants who avoided exposure to cow’s milk protein for at least the first three months of their lives. (emphasize - "EXPOSURE")

The American Academy of Pediatrics also recommends that infants below one year of age not be given cow’s milk as the iron in cow’s milk is hard for babies to absorb, and whole cow’s milk can cause microscopic bleeding in infants’ intestines. Studies have also shown that Infants and children who consume cow’s milk are more likely to develop food allergies, and are more likely to suffer from chronic constipation.

Colic is an additional concern with milk consumption. Up to 28% of infants suffer from colic during the first month of life. Pediatricians learned long ago that cow’s milk was often the reason. We also know that breastfeeding mothers can have colicky babies if the mothers consume cow’s milk.

As said – we know these substances pass through breast milk! There are clear warnings about not giving - or "exposing" - infants to cow’s milk or dairy...

...but isn’t most of ‘infancy’ spent nursing BREAST MILK? 

So why don't they tell nursing mothers to avoid it…?




Sources:
Cow’s milk challenge through human milk evoked immune responses in infants with cow’s milk allergy
Dietary manipulations for infantile colic
Dietary manipulations for infantile colic: A systemic review
A1 beta-casein milk protein and other environmental pre-disposing factors for type 1 diabetes
Short-term exclusive breast-feeding predisposes young children with increased genetic risk of type I diabetes to progressive beta-cell autoimmunity
Policy statement: breastfeeding and the use of human milk. From the American Academy of Pediatrics
Breastfeeding and the use of human milk
Whole cow’s milk in infancy
Update on food allergy
Frequency of cow’s milk allergy in childhood
Intolerance of cow’s milk and chronic constipation in children
The role of cow’s milk allergy in pediatric chronic constipation: a randomized clinical trial
Systematic review of the occurrence of infantile colic in the community




Thursday, August 17, 2023

Glyphosate

 

“Glyphosate is a non-selective systemic biocide with broad-spectrum activity, is the most widely used herbicide in the world.” Numerous commercial formulations of glyphosate also contain several adjuvants such as polyethoxylated tallow amine. Studies have shown glyphosate “can persist in the environment for days or months, and its intensive and large-scale use can constitute a major environmental and health problem.”
 
The mechanism of glyphosate “inhibits the enzymatic activity of the 5-endopyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) in the shikimic acid pathway, preventing the synthesis of the aromatic amino acids tyrosine, phenylalanine, and tryptophan.”
 
“An estimated 81% of the U.S. population has had recent exposure to glyphosate, a chemical found in some weed killers, according to a new study, Exposure to glyphosate in the United States: Data from the 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.”

Because low doses of glyphosate do not cause an obvious, immediate health problem, the EPA classified glyphosate in the least toxic category (category IV, practically non-toxic and non-irritating). However, this is extremely deceiving as repeated exposure can cause accumulation and serious, life-threatening health effects.

Recently, data on glyphosate contamination in the environment suggest that acute toxicity may not be as relevant as toxicity from chronic exposure to lower concentrations of this compound. Therefore, the number of publications demonstrating the chronic toxicity of glyphosate in animals and humans has increased considerably. This has led to increased concern about the potential harmful side effects that chronic exposure to glyphosate could have on animal and human health.”

A series of studies show that glyphosate and its commercial formulations can produce detrimental effects on the human nervous system. These investigations have shown that glyphosate can cross and affect the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and cause various types of short-term or long-term disturbances in the human nervous system. “Research now links glyphosate to health problems including cancer, reproductive problems, neurological diseases like ALS, endocrine disruption, and birth defects.” There is also evidence that glyphosate is disruptive your gut microbes, causing increased rates of other diseases such as Celiac disease.

Conclusion
“The information summarized in the present review indicates that exposure to glyphosate, AMPA, or GBH could induce several toxic effects on the nervous system of all species studied. Exposure to glyphosate during the early stages of life can severely affect normal cell development by deregulating some of the signaling pathways involved in this process, leading to alterations in differentiation, neuronal growth, migration, and myelination. Glyphosate also seems to exert a significant toxic effect on neurotransmission…the results analyzed herein reflect the capacity of glyphosate to induce oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction, processes that lead to neuronal death by autophagia, necrosis, or apoptosis, as well as the appearance of behavioral and motor disorders. Although there are important discrepancies between the findings analyzed in this review, it is unequivocal that exposure to glyphosate, alone or in commercial formulations, can produce important alterations in the structure and function of the nervous system of humans, rodents, fish, and invertebrate animals.”







Sunday, August 13, 2023

“You have your opinion, I have mine.”


I seek knowledge. If any given subject arises that I find myself not having comprehensive knowledge of, you can be assured I am going to spend time researching it. I have zero understanding of the (majority) of people who are just apathetic to educating themselves. 

So - when someone tells me, “I have a different opinion” on a subject I have spent years acquiring knowledge of, I am inherently curious. I am eager to hear them, find out what they know. Sadly, just about 100% of the time, they know absolutely nothing…they simply “disagree”…because they want to.

My quest for knowledge does not seek - nor give a crap about - someone’s 'opinion'. If my 'opinion' disagreed with the facts I would change my 'opinion'. But not for most - oh hell no - they simply “disagree” and feel no need for knowledge or evidence to support their ‘opinion’.

Obviously, it isn’t that they “disagree” at all. They simply do not have the knowledge base - nor do they want to attain it - and they most certainly do not want to change. 

While this is a lesson I have learned repeatedly - and should well know - inevitably I try to engage some intellectual discussion…only to once again meet the unfounded, hard clung-to, unflinching wall of 'opinion'.

Sigh…this world could truly be so easy – a few simple steps - to create a remarkably improved planet and a safer, healthier place for all, but instead it sometimes seems insurmountable with the hordes of indoctrinated minions out there with their steadfast – albeit completely irrational and unsupported – 'opinions'.



 

Wednesday, August 9, 2023

Dairy. What you need to know.

There is ample scientific evidence that questions the benefit of dairy consumption and indicates many health risks. The consumption of dairy has been linked with heart disease, certain cancers, digestive problems, diabetes, etc.

(complete list of sources and additional publications is included at the bottom of the page)

We are told we need milk for calcium to keep our bones strong. But in fact, research shows that dairy products have little or no benefit for bones. According to an analysis published in the British Medical Journal, most studies fail to show any link between dairy intake and broken bones, or fractures. A 2005 review published in the journal Pediatrics showed that drinking milk does not improve bone strength in children. In a more recent study, researchers tracked the diets, exercise, and stress fracture rates of young girls for seven years and concluded that dairy products and calcium do not prevent stress fractures in adolescent girls. And another study of more than 96,000 people found that the more milk men consumed as teenagers, the more bone fractures they experienced as adults.

To have healthy bones you need more than just calcium. Fruits and vegetables are especially beneficial for bones because they naturally contain all of the required nutrients for optimal human health.

All dairy products contribute significant amounts of cholesterol and saturated fat to the diet. Diets high in fat, and especially in saturated fat, can increase the risk of heart disease and stroke and can cause other serious health problems. (study here and study here)

On the other hand, a low-fat, plant-based diet (which eliminates dairy products) can not only prevent heart disease, but may even reverse it. (study here and study here)

Prostate Cancer: The danger of dairy product consumption as it relates to prostate cancer is most likely linked to increases in insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1). Consuming milk and dairy products on a regular basis has been shown to increase blood levels of IGF-1 in humans. Studies (study here and study here) in diverse populations have shown a strong and consistent link between IGF-1 in the blood and prostate cancer risk. One study showed that men with the highest levels of IGF-1 had more than four times the risk of prostate cancer, compared with those who had the lowest levels.

In another study, men who consumed three or more servings of dairy products a day had a 141% higher risk for death due to prostate cancer compared to those who consumed less than one serving. 

In the Physicians Health Study, which tracked 21,660 participants for 28 years, researchers found an increased risk of prostate cancer for those who consumed more than 2.5 servings of dairy products per day as compared with those who had fewer than 0.5 servings a day. This study, which is supported by other findings, also shows that prostate cancer risk is higher with increased consumption even if consuming low-fat milk.

Breast Cancer: A study of 1,893 women diagnosed with early-stage invasive breast cancer revealed that eating more high-fat dairy products was linked to higher mortality (death) rates. As little as half a serving per day increased risk significantly. Since hormones are stored in fat, consuming high-fat, rather than low-fat, dairy products likely means women are consuming more estrogen.

A second large study of 1,941 women found that women who consumed the highest amounts of cheddar, American, and cream cheeses had a 53% higher risk for breast cancer.

Research funded by the National Cancer Institute, the National Institutes of Health, and the World Cancer Research Fund, found that women who consumed 1/4 to 1/3 cup of cow’s milk per day had a 30% increased chance for breast cancer. One cup per day increased the risk by 50%, and 2-3 cups were associated with an 80% increased chance of breast cancer.

Ovarian Cancer: The consumption of dairy products may also contribute to development of ovarian cancer. The relationship between dairy products and ovarian cancer may be due to the breakdown of the milk sugar (lactose) into galactose, a sugar which may be toxic to ovarian cells. Two studies, one conducted in Sweden and one conducted among African American women, showed that consuming lactose and dairy products was positively linked to ovarian cancer. The Iowa Women’s Health Study found that women who consumed more than one glass of milk per day had a 73% greater chance of developing ovarian cancer than women who drank less than one glass per day.

Lung, Breast, and Ovarian Cancer: A large study published in the British Journal of Cancer identified 22,788 people who were lactose intolerant and found that those who avoided dairy (due to lactose intolerance) had a lower incidence of lung, breast, and ovarian cancers than their family members who did not avoid dairy. The researchers suggest that avoiding the saturated fat and extra hormones found in dairy products is protective against certain types of cancer.

Diabetes: Insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes is also linked to consumption of dairy products in infancy. A 2001 Finnish study of nearly 3,000 infants with genetically increased risk for developing diabetes showed that early introduction of cow’s milk increased susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. In addition, the American Academy of Pediatrics observed up to a 30% reduction in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in infants who avoid exposure to cow’s milk protein (including through breast milk) for at least the first three months of their lives.

Milk proteins, milk sugar, fat, and saturated fat in dairy products pose health risks for children and can lead to obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. While low-fat milk is often recommended for decreasing obesity risk, a study published in the Archives of Disease in Childhood showed that children who drank 1% or skim milk, compared with those who drank full-fat milk, were not any less likely to be obese.

The consumption of cow’s milk is not recommended for infants. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that infants below one year of age not be given cow’s milk. Not only is the iron in cow’s milk hard for babies to absorb, but whole cow’s milk can cause microscopic bleeding in infants’ intestines. 

Colic is an additional concern with milk consumption. Up to 28% of infants suffer from colic during the first month of life. Pediatricians learned long ago that cow’s milk was often the reason. We now know that breastfeeding mothers can have colicky babies if the mothers consume cow’s milk. (study here and study here)

Cow’s milk proteins can pass through the mother’s bloodstream, into her breast milk, and to the baby, causing symptoms in some infants.

Additionally, children who consume cow’s milk are more likely to develop food allergies and are more likely to suffer from chronic constipation.

Dairy often contains contaminants that range from hormones to pesticides to antibiotics. Milk naturally contains hormones and growth factors produced within a cow’s body, too. In addition, artificial hormones such as recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) are commonly given to cows to increase their milk production. Antibiotics are used to treat udder infections (mastitis) in cows. Traces of these antibiotics have been found in some samples of milk and dairy products. Unfortunately, antibiotics are used frequently, because mastitis is very common in cows due to farming practices that cause cows to produce more milk than nature intended.

Pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), melamine (often found in plastics and harmful to the kidneys and urinary tract), other cancer-causing toxins like aflatoxins, and dioxins are other examples of the many possible contaminants dairy. Dairy products contribute to one-fourth to one-half of the dietary intake of total dioxins (Bhandari SD, Schmidt RH, Rodrick GE. Hazards resulting frome nvironmental, industrial, and agricultural contaminants). All these toxins tend to build up in the body over time. Eventually, this can harm the immune, reproductive, and nervous systems. Moreover, PCBs and dioxins have been linked to cancer.

Somatic Cell Count: The number of somatic cells in milk, referred to as the somatic cell count or SCC, is used throughout the world as an indicator of milk quality. White blood cells constitute the majority of somatic cells measured (commonly known as pus). An increased SCC generally results from an inflammatory process due to the presence of an intramammary infection. 

What is the Somatic Cell Count?


The current regulatory limit for somatic cells in milk in the United States defined in the Grade "A" Pasteurized Milk Ordinance is 750,000 cells per milliliter (mL). That’s a lot of pus! 

Lactose Intolerance: Many people are intolerant to lactose. Often there are symptoms that are mysterious and not always understood as lactose intolerance. The National Institutes of Health estimates that 30 million to 50 million American adults are lactose intolerant, including 95% of Asians, 60-80% of African Americans and Ashkenazi Jews, 80-100% of American Indians, and 50-80% of Hispanics. Symptoms, which include upset stomach, diarrhea, and gas, occur because these individuals lack the enzyme lactase, which is needed to digest the milk sugar, lactose. Nursing children make enzymes that break down lactose, but as we grow up, many of us lose this capacity. As a result, lactose is not absorbed, but remains in the intestine where it causes symptoms.

- - - - - - - - -

"Dairy products contribute to a surprising number of health problems. They can impair a child's ability to absorb iron and in very small children can even cause subtle blood loss from the digestive tract. Combined with the fact that milk has virtually no iron of its own, the result is an increased risk of iron deficiency."
Benjamin Spock, MD, pediatrician and author, article "Good Nutrition for Kids"

"The fact is: the drinking of cow milk has been linked to iron-deficiency anemia in infants and children; it has been named as the cause of cramps and diarrhea in much of the world's population, and the cause of multiple forms of allergy as well; and the possibility has been raised that it may play a central role in the origins of atherosclerosis and heart attacks.”
Frank A. Oski, MD, Former Director of the Department of Pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University, Don't Drink Your Milk

"Milk contains fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol, and diets high in fat and saturated fat can increase the risk of several chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease...Organic milk may not contain the pesticides and antibiotics that non-organic milk contains, but still can be loaded with fat and cholesterol. Even organic cow’s milk, which does not contain artificial hormones, does contain naturally occurring hormones. These hormones have been shown to increase the risk of some forms of cancer."
Neal Barnard, MD

“Don’t drink milk for health. I am convinced on the weight of the scientific evidence that it does not 'do a body good.' Inclusion of milk will only reduce your diet’s nutritional value and safety."
Robert M. Kradjian, MD Former Chief of General Surgery at Seton Medical Center, "The Milk Letter: A Message to My Patients”

“The recommendation to drink three glasses of low-fat milk or eat three servings of other dairy products per day to prevent osteoporosis is another step in the wrong Direction… Three glasses of low-fat milk add more than 300 calories a day. This is a real issue for the millions of Americans who are trying to control their weight. What's more, millions of Americans are lactose intolerant, and even small amounts of milk or dairy products give them stomachaches, gas, or other problems. This recommendation ignores the lack of evidence for a link between consumption of dairy products and prevention of osteoporosis. It also ignores the possible increases in risk of ovarian cancer and prostate cancer associated with dairy products.”
Harvard School of Public Health; On the Consumption of Dairy Products (2005)

"Cow's milk is a foreign substance that has pervaded every corner of our diets... Today there is little doubt that early and frequent feeding of dairy products leads to greatly increased incidence of childhood diabetes. It has been confirmed that high cow's milk consumption is a major cause of osteoporosis."
Linda Folden Palmer, DC, chiropractor and author, Baby Matters: What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Caring for Your Baby (2007)

"Milk and refined sugar make two of the largest contributions to food induced ill health in our country... It is my strong recommendation that you discontinue your milk products."
Joseph Mercola, DO, Osteopathic Physician

"The human body has no more need for cows’ milk than it does for dogs’ milk, horses’ milk, or giraffes’ milk. There is absolutely no nutrient, no protein, no vitamin, no mineral that can't be obtained from plant-based foods."
Michael Klaper, MD

Michael Klaper, MD

Conclusion

Milk and dairy products are not necessary in our diet and can even be harmful to health. It’s best to consume a healthful plant-based diet. Nutrient-dense plant-based foods can help you meet your nutrient requirements with ease - without the health risks associated with consuming dairy products.

- - - - - - - -

Related articles:
Overwhelming evidence
Species-appropriate food choices



Sources and additional publications

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784799/

Feskanich D, Willett WC, Colditz GA. Calcium, vitamin D, milk consumption, and hip fractures: a prospective study among postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003
Lanou AJ, Berkow SE, Barnard ND. Calcium, dairy products, and bone health in children and young adults: a reevaluation of the evidence. Pediatrics. 2005

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24606431/

Sonneville KR, Gordon CM, Kocher MS, Pierce LM, Ramappa A, Field AE. Vitamin D, calcium, and dairy intakes and stress fractures among female adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012

Holick MF, Garabedian M. Vitamin D: photobiology, metabolism, mechanism of action, and clinical applications. In: Favus MJ, ed. Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism. 6th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; 2006

Zhang R, Naughton D. Vitamin D in health and disease: current perspectives. Nutr J. 2010

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998914/

Holick M. The vitamin D epidemic and its health consequences. J Nutr. 2005

Reid DM, New SA. Nutritional influences on bone mass. Proceed Nutr Soc. 1997

Lin P, Ginty F, Appel L, et al. The DASH diet and sodium reduction improve markers of bone turnover and calcium metabolism in adults. J Nutr. 2001

Qiu R, Cao W, Tian H, He J, Chen G, Chen Y. Greater intake of fruit and vegetables is associated with greater bone mineral density and lower osteoporosis risk in middle-aged and elderly adults. PLoS ONE. 2017

https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/49/5/1526/5743492

National Institutes of Health. NIH Osteoporosis and Related Bone Diseases National Resources Center. Calcium and Vitamin D: Important at Every Age.

https://www.bones.nih.gov/health-info/bone/bone-health/nutrition/calcium-and-vitamin-d-important-every-age.

Marques EA, Mota J, Carvalho J. Exercise effects on bone mineral density in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Age. 2012

Going S, Lohman T, Houtkooper L, et al. Effects of exercise on bone mineral density in calcium-replete ostmenopausal women with and without hormone replacement therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2003

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26987270/

Lunt M, Masaryk P, Scheidt-Nave C, et al. The effects of lifestyle, dietary dairy intake and diabetes on bone density and vertebral deformity prevalence: the EVOS study. Osteoporos Int. 2001

Lloyd T, Beck TJ, Lin HM, et al. Modifiable determinants of bone status in young women. Bone. 2002

Li Y, Hruby A, Bernstein AM, et al. Saturated fats compared with unsaturated fats and sources of carbohydrates in relation to risk of coronary heart disease: a prospective cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015

https://www.pcrm.org/news/health-nutrition/new-review-finds-dairy-products-linked-prostate-cancer

Chen M, Li Y, Sun Q, et al. Dairy fat and risk of cardiovascular disease in 3 cohorts of US adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016

Szeto YT, Kwok TC, Benzie IF. Effects of a long-term vegetarian diet on biomarkers of antioxidants status and cardiovascular disease risk. Nutrition. 2004

Ornish D, Brown SE, Scherwitz LW, et al. Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary heart disease? Lancet. 1990

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25527754/

Qin L, Xu J, Wang P, Tong J, Hoshi K. Milk consumption is a risk factor for prostate cancer in Western countries: evidence from cohort studies. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2007

Song Y, Chavarro JE, Cao Y, et al. Whole milk intake is associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality among U.S. male physicians. J Nutr. 2013

Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Ma J, Gann PH, Gaziano JM, Giovannucci E. Dairy products, calcium, and prostate cancer risk in the Physicians’ Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001

Voskuil DW, Vrieling A, van’t Veer LJ, Kampman E, Rookus MA. The insulin-like growth factor system in cancer prevention: potential of dietary intervention strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25989745/

Qin LQ, He K, Xu JY. Milk consumption and circulating insulin-like growth factor-I level: a systematic literature review. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009

Cohen P. Serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels and prostate cancer risk—interpreting the evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26561618/

Shi R, Berkel HJ, Yu H. Insulin-like growth factor-I and prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 1998

Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, et al. Plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 and prostate cancer risk: a prospective study. Science. 1998

Tseng M, Breslow RA, Graubard BI, Ziegler RG. Dairy, calcium and vitamin D intakes and prostate cancer risk in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Epidemiologic Follow-up Study cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005

Yang M, Kenfield SA, Van Blarigan EL, et al. Dairy intake after prostate cancer diagnosis in relation to disease-specific and total mortality. Int J Cancer. 2015

Kroenke CH, Kwan ML, Sweeney C, Castillo A, Caan BJ. High- and low-fat dairy intake, recurrence, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis. JNatl Cancer Inst. 2013

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35672028

Cramer DW, Greenberg ER, Titus-Ernstoff L, et al. A case-control study of galactose consumption and metabolism in relation to ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000

Larsson SC, Bergkvist L, Wolk A. Milk and lactose intakes and ovarian cancer risk in the Swedish Mammography Cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004

Qin B, Moorman PG, Alberg AJ, et al. Dairy, calcium, vitamin D and ovarian cancer risk in African American Women. Br J Cancer. 2016

Kushi LH, Mink PJ, Folsom AR, et al. Prospective study of diet and ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1999

Ji J, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Lactose intolerance and risk of lung, breast and ovarian cancers: aetiological clues from a population-based study in Sweden. Br J Cancer. 2015

US Department of Health and Human Services. Lactose Intolerance: Information for Health Care Providers. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Swallow DM. Genetics of lactase persistence and lactose intolerance. Annu Rev Genet. 2003

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639864/

Outwater JL, Nicholson A, Barnard N. Dairy products and breast cancer: the IGF-1, estrogen, and bGH hypothesis. Med Hypothesis. 1997

Azzouz A, Jurado-Sánchez B, Souhail B, Ballesteros E. Simultaneous determination of 20 pharmacologically active substances in cow’s milk, goat’s milk, and human breast milk by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem. 2011

Bhandari SD, Schmidt RH, Rodrick GE. Hazards resulting from environmental, industrial, and agricultural contaminants. In: S chmidt RH, Rodrick GE, eds. Food Safety Handbook. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2005

National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences. Health and Education: Dioxins. Available at: https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/dioxins/index.cfm.

Fischer WJ, Schilter B, Tritscher AM, Stadler RH. Contaminants of milk and dairy products: contamination resulting from farm and dairy practices. In: Fuquay JW, ed. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2011

Prandini A, Tansini G, Sigolo S, Filippi L, Laporta M, Piva G. On the occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in milk and dairy products. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009

https://www.pcrm.org/good-nutrition/nutrition-information/health-concerns-about-dairy

Chia JSJ, McRae JL, Kukuljan S, et al. A1 beta-casein milk protein and other environmental pre-disposing factors for type 1 diabetes. Nutr Diabetes. 2017

Kimpimaki T, Erkkola M, Korhonen S, et al. Short-term exclusive breast-feeding predisposes young children with increased genetic risk of type I diabetes to progressive beta-cell autoimmunity. Diabetologia. 2001

Eidelman AI, Schanler RJ. Policy statement: breastfeeding and the use of human milk. From the American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2012

Scharf RJ, Demmer RT, DeBoer MD. Longitudinal evaluation of milk type consumed and weight status in preschoolers. Arch Dis Child. 2013

Chen M, Pan A, Malik VS, Hu FB. Effects of dairy intake on body weight and fat: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012

Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, et al. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24247817/

Leung AK, Sauve RS. Whole cow’s milk in infancy. Paediatr Child Health. 2003

Lucassen PL, Assendelft WJ, van Eijk JT, Gubbels JW, Douwes AC, van Geldrop WJ. Systematic review of the occurrence of infantile colic in the community. Arch Dis Child. 2001

Jarvinen KM, Makinen-Kiljunen S, Suomalainen H. Cow’s milk challenge through human milk evoked immune responses in infants with cow’s milk allergy. J Pediatr. 1999

Leung AKC. Dietary manipulations for infantile colic. Paediatr Child Health. 2003

Sampson HA. Update on food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004

Host A. Frequency of cow’s milk allergy in childhood. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002

Iacono G, Cavataio F, Montalto G, et al. Intolerance of cow’s milk and chronic constipation in children. N Engl J Med. 1998

Dehghani SM, Ahmadpour B, Haghighat M, Kashef S, Imanieh MH, Soleimani M. The role of cow’s milk allergy in pediatric chronic constipation: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Pediatr. 2012


Friday, August 4, 2023

Vitamins and supplements are just drugs in disguise

 

The supplementation promoters are just like Big Pharma. They care about $$$ and will say just about anything to sell you their crap. 

Many people believe supplementation will enhance their nutritional value and will prevent or repair dietary deficiencies. 

THIS IS NOT SO! If you are deficient in anything then your FOOD is what needs repair, not some chemical concoction that has absolutely no resemblance to the natural nutritional needs of our body. 

Your doctor or nurse will not - under almost all circumstances - be prepared to offer any solid nutritional advice and will quickly advise these potentially dangerous drugs (vitamins/supplements). They will almost always bypass the most simple and most effective 'cure' for every 'disease' known to human and instead pull out their prescription pad or advise chemicals, procedures, injections, etc.

Protect yourself and your loved ones. They are NOT 'smarter' than you, and in fact there is a very high likelihood that following the current medical profession's direction without question will lead to serious bodily harm (if not death) and a lifetime of poor health and/or poor quality of life by feeling ill, depressed, tired, achy, etc.

Supplementation in any form will only add burden to the body. It is not a natural substance and the chance of any proper utilization of whatever one believes they are adding is probably zero. On top of that, other problems can be triggered by the body's attempt at utilizing and/or expelling this foreign substance

Real food - true species-appropriate nutrition - and avoiding toxins will do tremendous things to enhance our health and quality of life.

Throw the damn supplements in the trash, eat real, species-appropriate food, and stop taking in toxins. Your body will thank you.

Dr. Andrew Kaufman
(and get outside - get some sun!)